Page 2 of 3
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2003 4:25 pm
by Buddy of Neville
without war, what would the blood thirsty americans and british do with there spare time.
im a brit, and i hate the idea of war man.....why die when u can get caned

Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2003 2:14 am
by Poke_Smot_Love_420
I generally don't want to go to war, we potheads are a peaceful people.
But I do want that bastard to go down and if we have to do it with military force then so be it. Anything to stop the threat of chemical, biological, or even nuclear war on the people of this world.
GIVE PEACE A CHANCE
Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2003 7:08 am
by The Venal Marijuana God
well put mate well im in aus and john coward has just sent australia to war in 48 hours,oh shit!
Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2003 10:24 am
by Born of Fire
I guess it's really gonna happen then

and all this time I was hoping there would be a peaceful loophole outta this insane business

oh well, these may be our last days if terrorists light up around the world like Saddam said, so nows the time to splash out and get really stoned each day

Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2003 2:54 pm
by buddingneville
britain and sa should go to wae i would love to join them but i is to youngwa

Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2003 3:40 pm
by Jimbo Baggins
PuffPuffPass - you clearly are very immature. You don't know the first thing about the present political situation in the Gulf, so don't try and make yourself look hard by saying "hell yeah, fuck those terrorists."
Instead of coming home after nursery, try putting the news on instead of watching the Tweenies, and you might actually learn something.
To this date, the only country who have ever used nuclear weapons in anger is the USA. Britain has twice as many nuclear warheads as Iraq has ever had at any time over the last 12 years, yet we don't seem to hear about the them do we?
At a time of war, the US government is granted special powers in order to pass 'emergency' policies through congress without having to ask them to vote on it.
These powers will enable the US government to pass many new policies and sanctions without anyone being able to question it.
Rolling into Iraq with 250'000 troops and over 800 battle tanks and planes to shit them up?
Who's terrorising who PuffPuffPass?

Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2003 4:14 pm
by Daddy
JimboBaggins some one who speaks sense.
Although we dont share all the same views all the time that is one of the best responses i have read.
Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2003 5:41 pm
by Funk Doctor
Bush is yapping about Iraqi nukes, and now he's gonna drop mini-nukes himself? That guy is definetly smoking some laced weed.
As for the biological and chemical threat, I recall a certain substance called Agent Orange being sprayed by certain American choppers onto certain Vietnamese innocents. I also read articles by respected newspapers about the CIA testing chemicals onto unsuspecting civilians. So Bush should keep his mouth shut about the "terror of biological and chemical warfare".
And I have the perfect solution for possible Iraqi WOMD's: let Saddam shoot them all towards the White House. That way, Saddam is happy, I am happy and Bush will know for sure Iraq has no more WOMD's. Problem solved.
If anything, you cowboys should be dealing with North Korea. They actually SAID they wouldn't hesitate to attack US troops in the Korea area. But nooooo, Ol' Dubya wants his oil first.
FUCK THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT!!! ANARCHY!!!!!!!!
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2003 10:53 pm
by Monarchy Flames
Well said dude, you know what lets Drop some really shit ganja down in iraq and watch the wankers Choke to death, i only found out we were even talking about war about 2 days a go lol, Been stoned too much and i dont have time to turn on tv or, Read newspaper. Fuck this shit is gonna burm {Stoned}
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2003 10:58 pm
by Monarchy Flames
Wow, White widow

Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2003 11:56 pm
by Azim
jimbo baggins you are indeed wise my friend, I agree with everything there (and remembered agent orange of which i haven't even thought about for nearly 3 years)
I will have to put one of your points to shame however, sorry. But the brits have not had twice as much nukes as the iraqis at any one time. Iraq as far as we know has no nukes and basically if he does get some he will only have one maybe two perhaps? well the brits have about 20 nukes stashed away somewhere, presents from the yanks i think, the french even have them.
Oh and about North Korea, there's no oil there.
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2003 11:32 am
by Born of Fire
Azim wrote:Oh and about North Korea, there's no oil there.
nor any dogs

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2003 11:45 am
by ROCCO69

no one denies saddam is gay i suppose people think america stick there nose in too much. but remember this all the countries of the west agreed to fight terrorism and never back down from it. so what happens shit goes down the americans say were not having that and no one can decide. the germans see cash the french always back down and the cis aint got a pot to piss in
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2003 1:26 pm
by Jimbo Baggins
Azim - my point was that the uk has more weapons of mass destruction than Iraq. Clearly if Iraq only has 2 and the uk has 20 then my point is valid so what the fuck are you banging on about?
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2003 1:36 pm
by ROCCO69

YO FUNK DOC KEEP IT REAL THIS IS NOT ABOUT OIL THIS IS ABOUT NOT TAKING SHIT FROM PEOPLE YOU DONT LIKE. THE AMERICANS WIL NOT TAKE CRAP OF INFIDELS NOW WHILE TOU SIT THERE SLAGGING THEM OFF REMEMNER THIS THE FREEDOM YOU LIVE IN IS PUT THERE BY MAINLY THE AMERICANS IF YOU DONT LIKE HOW YOUR FREEDOM IS GAINED GO AND LIVE IN FUCKING CHINA
LOVE BRAVEHEART